Project 2 Analysis

I actually really enjoyed Project 2. I was able to write about something I am very passionate about but I had to do it in such a way that was totally objective. This meant, I got to physically construct an argument based off of real life evidence that I have been arguing for my entire life. Now, when I ask someone to refrain from using the R-word I have seven pages of objective research to back me up. It was, still, very challenging to keep the paper objective. In my original peer review, I was told the paper still sounded somewhat subjective and had some subjective lines. This was something I definitely struggled with because it is a topic I have strong feelings and opinions about. I even went over my first draft multiple times to make sure it didn't sound subjective but of course, it still was. I think I was successful in my revisions which was something I had trouble with on project 1. I did more research and added a lot of new information and evidence to my final draft. I think I was very effective in my writing process. I had very strong and valid points all of which were backed up with several pieces of credible and reliable evidence. I did extensive research on something I considered myself already knowledgeable on. I also think I was successful in writing in this genre. Like I said, I struggled trying to keep the paper objective, but in the end I felt I was successful in doing so. I was proud of my finished project. I enjoyed the creative piece as well. I think it is something small that holds a powerful message. I really liked my final piece.